<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>formal verse - Poetry Writting - tribe.net</title>
    <link>http://lisapoetry.tribe.net/thread/f0faed5f-d862-473b-89ee-041c656afbbe?format=rss</link>
    <description>Tribe.net. Local Connections</description>
    <item>
      <title>Re: formal verse</title>
      <link>http://lisapoetry.tribe.net/thread/f0faed5f-d862-473b-89ee-041c656afbbe#b545dc22-e945-4082-843d-0af21d98a188</link>
      <description>Good call.  I found a few Dickinson ballads that I'm going to try to mimic.  Thanks.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:27:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://lisapoetry.tribe.net/thread/f0faed5f-d862-473b-89ee-041c656afbbe#b545dc22-e945-4082-843d-0af21d98a188</guid>
      <dc:creator>Julian</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-06-30T13:27:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: formal verse</title>
      <link>http://lisapoetry.tribe.net/thread/f0faed5f-d862-473b-89ee-041c656afbbe#595d7661-472e-4efe-bd03-397a6d25792a</link>
      <description>not sure about the textbook version...though there might be something.&#xD;
&#xD;
"Now is the winter of our discontent"&#xD;
&#xD;
- that is a good example.&#xD;
&#xD;
I suspect the discrepancy is that between spoken English in his time and presently...&#xD;
&#xD;
or perhaps the "mood" of the thing...&#xD;
&#xD;
in our language today, "now" tends to be used aggressively, as a kind of command or immediacy..&#xD;
&#xD;
I suspect in today's English the phrase, in terms of meaning could be more clearly written...&#xD;
&#xD;
"and then came the suffering..."&#xD;
&#xD;
where "Now" is not so striking or hard or quick...but a subtle movement forward...the way we might use a pause or hesitation, rather than a direction or command...&#xD;
&#xD;
Shakespeare is probably the single most complex poet on the planet...ever.  Plus, again, even though it is English, it is a very different English than modern English.  It is only a few hundred years after Chaucer...and his English...which was closer to modern German, than to modern English.&#xD;
&#xD;
So, if you want to write in a formal style and experiment with meter and such, I would focus on modern work, in which the English used is that with which you are already familiar.  Then, there should be less confusion.&#xD;
&#xD;
Maybe work with Dickinson, Emerson and Whitman.  Their English is American English, reasonably modern and yet more formal in structure than most of the poems written today.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 03:09:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://lisapoetry.tribe.net/thread/f0faed5f-d862-473b-89ee-041c656afbbe#595d7661-472e-4efe-bd03-397a6d25792a</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-06-27T03:09:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: formal verse</title>
      <link>http://lisapoetry.tribe.net/thread/f0faed5f-d862-473b-89ee-041c656afbbe#064853ce-0094-40c9-a47c-5249189b0641</link>
      <description>For instance, when I read Shakespeare's line "Now is the winter of our discontent" out loud, I just don't get a clear sense that the line is written in iambic pentameter.  &#xD;
&#xD;
For me, it would be natural to stress "now" instead of "is" and to read both "of" and "our" as unstressed.&#xD;
&#xD;
So, I'm wondering if there is a textbook way to tell which syllables are stressed/unstressed, such that a poet could be judged to have failed at writing in a particular meter. &#xD;
&#xD;
Admittedly, I just might be over thinking this.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:13:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://lisapoetry.tribe.net/thread/f0faed5f-d862-473b-89ee-041c656afbbe#064853ce-0094-40c9-a47c-5249189b0641</guid>
      <dc:creator>Julian</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-06-26T22:13:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: formal verse</title>
      <link>http://lisapoetry.tribe.net/thread/f0faed5f-d862-473b-89ee-041c656afbbe#94c42c35-651b-4d47-a205-b2e06da49046</link>
      <description>could you give some specific examples?&#xD;
&#xD;
one idea might simply be to read the word out loud, and also read the full line of poetry out loud.  That might give you a natural sense of the rhythm and "music" in the piece...&#xD;
&#xD;
when you read Shakespeare out loud, the iambic pentameter really, you know..sings.  The beat is just perfect.  Even if not "conscious" your own ear should be a good guide to what fits and what does not.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 00:28:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://lisapoetry.tribe.net/thread/f0faed5f-d862-473b-89ee-041c656afbbe#94c42c35-651b-4d47-a205-b2e06da49046</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-06-26T00:28:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>formal verse</title>
      <link>http://lisapoetry.tribe.net/thread/f0faed5f-d862-473b-89ee-041c656afbbe#dda95f36-e765-4b7f-a11f-93e99560023d</link>
      <description>Hi all, I'm experimenting with writing formal verse (accentual-syllabic) and I am having some trouble consistently discerning stressed from unstressed syllables.  There are some cases where it seems that a given word could go either way.  If anyone has any pointers or resources on this to share, I'd appreciate it.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 18:01:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://lisapoetry.tribe.net/thread/f0faed5f-d862-473b-89ee-041c656afbbe#dda95f36-e765-4b7f-a11f-93e99560023d</guid>
      <dc:creator>Julian</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-06-25T18:01:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>



